Jump to content
X2Community Forums


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


eugeneb last won the day on January 28 2022

eugeneb had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

50 Excellent

1 Follower

About eugeneb

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Centurion, south Africa

Contact Methods

  • Skype

Recent Profile Visitors

40040907 profile views
  1. Thanks. I will give it a try 😉
  2. Hi Jack, its here in the API documentation: http://wiki.x2crm.com/wiki/REST_API_Reference#General_Search_Option_Parameters
  3. Is there anyway to increase the API record limitation of 1000 records for the Open Source version? The documentation says: Set to a number to control the maximum number of records to include in the results of the search. The default and maximum page size is 1000, and in Platinum Edition this default amount is user-configurable. Any help will be appreciated. Regards
  4. As an X2 user for many years, I share your concern about the ongoing development and support for the X2 Open Source version. While I have found X2 to be the best and most flexible small business ERP system, it seems that the versions 8.1 is now quite old and unsupported, and I have more than 20 customer installations of various complexity that need to be updated. I would appreciate it if anyone from the X2 team could give us some indication of whether or not X2 still intends to support and offer an open source version in the future. I believe this would not only benefit current users like
  5. That works great thanks. I didnt realise I can use a users thats not an admin. But seems to work just fine. Thanks
  6. Hi guys, might be a weird request. But is there a way to send selected fields via a GET request. Not all fields and data on a record? My app and systems works great but the API GET request sends obviously all fields and data in the JSON response. But is there a command variable, espesially using the Direct URI to simply pass through certain fields? Thanks
  7. @jack can this also be one of the reasons?. I found this forum post that sounds like it is related.
  8. Thanks Jack. I will give it a try. I am sure this must be an issue for other users also? I haven't searched the forum specifically.
  9. Thanks Jack. My concern is more why is it different from the Docs module to the editor used in the Campaign. Its actually been doing this since I used X2. I always have to open my HTML email in the campaign editor to make sure it works. Then I go back and scale down the styling and code in the Docs module. In the campaign editor you cant really have anything other than the most simplistic HTML. I always thought its to make the email more readable over the various browsers. Should it not be the same? Its really horrible because one takes time developing your emails. then run the campa
  10. Something I have seen for years with X2 that doesn't make sense! I go to a lot of trouble designing my responsive emails in Docs module as templates. I don't use any complex HTML and keep it super simple. I mainly do text based campaigns but need some basic styling with tabled, colors etc. When I then use these templates in a Campaign, the campaign rich text editor then deletes most of the code and ends up sending this vanilla email that doesn't look at all like what I designed. Why is this? Why is the rich text editor in Docs somehow different from the editor in Campaign?
  11. Hi guys, I might be to quick but I see the upgrade to 8.3. Fantastic news and long awaited. Thanks so much for the opensource upgrade. Is there a changelog to show the changes made between 8.0 and 8.3? Thanks
  12. Not sure if this was solved. But what I did for this is create a lookup field between the modules to create the relationship. Then using a workflow I 'pull' the info I want from the one module and populate the fields from the other module with that info based on a record create or record update action. Note: As the receiving module does not have the source info and only displays what it receives from the source module, it would be an integrity issue to allow changes made to the receiving module fields as it wont obviously update backwards to the source module. For this I simply lock
  13. Have you turned on the log in Gravity to see where it creates a problem. BTW what is the problem. Is it not pushing through to X2 any data?
  • Create New...